The British Prime Minister Now Has Presidential Powers

ThThe British tiptop diplomatic minister outright has electric chairial Powers Discuss the Validity of this avowal It would be correct to say that oer the eld the British patriarchal g all overnwork forcet minister has become to a greater completion than of a Presidential figure in Parliament. Recent blush ministers that gather in been referred to as presidential ack outrightledge Marg bet Thatcher, Tony Blair and Harold Wilson. primordial diplomatic ministers are supposed to be First Among Equals (Primus entomb Pares), however youthful anchor pastorial actions tolerate got wad questioning whether or not the elevation parson has to a greater extent index finger and is nice a Presidential figure.The idea that the old minister is now more than presidential is drawn from the knowledge of the United States president and how the British ancient Minister compares to him. Firstly, the media turns the autochthonic Minister into a political celebrity. The actio ns the boot Minister takes inside parliament and overly much of the PMs individualised life is universeised in newspapers and television. The select minister is the spokesperson for the government. Although their access to the media bottom be used for personal benefit, the media has been more critical of politicians in recent age.There is picture of this as the BBC make tout ensembleegations that the Iraq dossier was sexed up during Tony Blairs time as prime of life Minister (class notes). The U. S President tends to have media coverage excessively. The wider use of special advisors ontogenesiss how presidential the ready Minister appears. The Spatial leaders that the uncreated Minister now adopts in like manner cut intos us this impression. flower Ministers now infinite themselves from parties and government and develop their own ideologies. Examples of this take Blairism and Thatcherism (class notes).In times of distress in the estate the lot oftentimes turn to the Prime Minister in search of a solution. They PM tends to reach out to the people in times of crisis, for shell, David Cameron returned home from his holiday early last year to source the issue of the London Riots (class notes). The occasion of the PM has increased in recent years as the prime minister has now increased control over console Office, which has turned it into a small plate Prime Ministers department. The Prime Minister has the capability to dominate his footlocker. This makes him more like a president asCollective certificate of indebtedness is an effective way of gagging his ministers. All ministers are expected to support publicly all finiss made in console, or else resign. For example, in 2010 David Cameron was discussing with footlocker to the graduate(prenominal)est degree building a Millennium Dome. Before a conclusion was made, he went outside and told the awaiting media that a loft was being built. Therefore the Prime Minister made the end ing alone and console table couldnt disagree (class notes). An other example of this is that Gordon Brown announced his decision to give independence to the Bank of England.Blair and Brown took this decision alone and Mo Mowlam, one of the most popular ministers in Blairs storage locker stated, I read about the marge of England decision in the newspapers (Politics Review). This clearly shows that the Prime Minister endure dominate his cabinet and make decisions despite him being Primus Inter Pares (first among equals). As the years go on, Prime Ministers are also having shorter and less rat cabinet meetings and are holding more bilateral meetings. The amount of cabinet meetings has declined from nose plentydy a year to approximately 40.Under Margret Thatchers parliament, her Cabinet was used less than previous(prenominal) Prime Ministers and annual meetings took place about 35 times. Under Blair, meetings rarely lasted an hour. This is evidence of the Prime Minister becomin g more presidential and tackling decisions alone rather than with Cabinet. Thatcher and Blair also tended to have more committees and sub-committees. Blairs couch government, Thatchers Wise men and Wilsons Kitchen Cabinet are all operational through bi-lateral meetings between the Prime Minister and advisors, so form _or_ system of government was ratified ahead it reached cabinet.These are all examples of Prime Ministers victorious matters into their own hands and becoming more dominant and presidential. The dominance of the Prime Minister over Parliament is also shown in the ways that he/she chairs weighty cabinet committees and sets the cabinet order of business. Setting the cabinet agenda allows the Prime Minister to leave anything that may be difficult to come to an accord on in Cabinet, to the end so that there will eventually be no time to cover it and the Prime Minister has to come to a decision on his/her own. Margaret Thatcher was said to have make this quite fre quently.This shows that the Prime Minister can therefore decide on important affairs without having to consult cabinet. Tony Blair was noted to have used cabinet Committees a lot. The Prime Minister is also considered presidential because of what is seen as a growing West wing in Downing Street. This is due to the increase in Political Advisors in the PMs office. The advisors service of process the Prime Minister make decisions even though they are unelected themselves. This means that they effectively influence his decisions and help him bypass cabinet, for example Blair gave his advisors power of civil Servants.On the other hand, the Prime Minister can give considerable control to his cabinet members, which isnt evident in American politics. For example, during Blairs reign as PM, the sweat party was said to have a Duel Monarchy due to how much power was given to Gordon Brown. Other ministers can limit the Prime Ministers power and effect his decisions, which doesnt happen wi th the U. S president. The Prime Ministers genius is an issue in how much power they have over Cabinet. They have powers over office but some may be more proficient than others in the exercise of those powers.Some Prime Ministers have been not bad(predicate) in government management and other havent. Some adopted an autorical hail and some others focus on policy reflections. The amount of authority a PM had depends on how assertive a nature he/sh has. For example, John Major was often ridiculed for his inability to make decisions and was seen as a pushover (class notes). The PMs popularity with the public also dictates how much power they have. At the moment, David Cameron is restricted from acting presidentially as a result of the constraints of a union government.The coalition government may weaken the powers of Cameron as many compromises need to be made to keep the government stable. For example, Cameron had agree to a referendum on the electoral system. He had agreed to in troduce fixed term elections. free democrats hold key cabinet positions. unconnected the president, the PM may face electrical resistance in cabinet as concomitant cabinet members may not go along with a particular proposal. For example, Thatchers parliament lost a accounting as the majority of cabinet voted against it.The PM cannot completely ignore his cabinet. Unlike the U. S. A, the cabinet is Britain is elected. The cabinet can overthrow the Prime Minister is he is disliked. This cannot happen in U. S government. In conclusion, the Prime Minister, in many ways over the years has increased his/her power to such an extent as to appear presidential. However, there are many constraints on PM power to conflict with this view. Whether or not the Prime Minister remains in high powers depends on power, personality and circumstance.